About Us Contact Us

Cheap Colour Pod dye ink replaces Canon Pixma MX390 - CL-541XL x3

Product Code:
CIE-CL-540-D-POD x3*
Compatible:
Canon  Dye Ink
Colour:
Colour Pod
Contains:
61.5ml
Replaces:
CL-541XL x3, 5227B005AA

Qty Price
1 - 3 £9.75 each ex vat / £11.70 inc vat

Ask a question about this product
(0 questions | 0 answers)
Question Subject:
Details:

Asked by 7/28/2021 3:05:45 AM

Description
Specifications

About Cheap Colour Pod dye ink replaces Canon Pixma MX390 - CL-541XL x3

Please note our Pixma MX390 ciss systems, Pixma MX390 Canon bulk refills and Pixma MX390 refillable ink cartridges are not made by Canon this is a registered trademark and we use the term for descriptive purposes only.

Unfortunately due to the design of the printer we were not able to make a continuous ink system fit in the Pixma MX390 printer, in our opinion this is the next best thing you are going to find with low running costs.

This is a 3 pack of colour refill pods for our refillable ink cartridges for the Pixma MX390 printer we also sell here here as a complete kit which replaces CL-541XL x3, 5227B005AA, , .

In the 540xl colour cartridge it contains 15ml - our refillable cartridge contains 20.5ml so these are even bigger than an XL version.

Extremely easy to use and install in a modified cartridge - just see our video here of how to modify a cartridge to accept this - you only have to do it once to start saving money.



On in-depth testing of this product on a new genuine cartridge we were able to refill the cartridge with 9 pods before the head died on the cartridge and we had to replace it.

If you refilling a used or re-manufactured cartridge with these pods it would be reduced depending on the condition of your ink cartridge.

This product is offered as an alternative to a ciss continuous ink system for the Canon Pixma MX390 printer which uses the following inks CL-541XL x3, 5227B005AA, , .

Specifications

Made by:
FotoRite
Printer Model:
Canon Pixma MX390
Ink Type:
Dye Ink
Replaces:
CL-541XL x3 , 5227B005AA


Product Discussion